Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 1 has ratings and 14 reviews. John said: In many ways, this book is necessary w. This chapter offers a reading of Søren Kierkegaard’s philosophical work Concluding Unscientific Postscript to ‘Philosophical Fragments’ to illuminate his ideas. In Philosophical Fragments the pseudonymous author Johannes Climacus explored the Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments.
|Published (Last):||27 December 2008|
|PDF File Size:||10.64 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.71 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Thanks for telling us about the problem. He was referring to Kierkegaard’s distrust of system builders which he discussed in The Concluding Unscientific Postscript p.
Objective truth is that which relates to propositions, that which has no relation to the existence of the knower.
It then examines Kierkegaard’s arguments about God’s transcendence and revelation, faith and subjectivity. In keeping the principle “understanding is revocation”, the appendix specifies that it itself as the book’s “Understanding” is “indeed precisely the book’s Revocation” Trivia About Concluding Unscie Is it more essential that a prayer be genuine with regard to matters of “objective” concern — i.
Classical, Early, and Medieval Plays and Playwrights: For these reasons, Hannay’s Postscript is not merely the book’s best English translation yet; it is also the most inviting and accessible. He says “a logical system is possible, but an existential system is impossible. Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service.
Do not read his work Excellent sequel to “Philosophical Fragments”. It cannot, then, be a surprise to see man more and more engulfed in the object, in things, in material being, in economic life, in technics, in a one-sided, quantitative manner of thinking, and in quantitative standards of value. This is a regrettable missed opportunity: You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Instead, the point is that the passionate pagan does indeed fulfill the task of praying to God despite the fact that he gets the objective dimension of his prayer wrong he mistakes an idol for God. According to Climacus, all objective knowledge is subject to doubt. Kierkegaard covers so many relevant problems and provides so much glory for the mind that it is almost appalling that he has not gotten the recognition he rightfully deserves.
Certainly Tillich, who unecientific often critical of Hegel, nearly always speaks in praise of Kierkegaard, and he gives such an important place in his own thinking to the category of existence that he seems at times to be travelling in the Danish thinker’s footsteps. Hannay’s offerings are deservedly popular: As the Postscript nears its climax, it struggles to pinpoint the distinction between true Christianity postscrip other forms of life.
Lassetter rated it really liked it Aug 11, Does that mean those people are Christian?
The book also includes a useful chronology, a well-chosen list of recommended secondary conclduing, and helpful translator’s notes alongside the text. It means that existence and especially Christianity, or really any religion, are much more difficult than we make it out to be.
Oxford UP,pp. It is, in sum, ideal for the non-specialist reader — and the clear best choice for the undergraduate classroom.
This, according to Hannay, is why the Postscript ‘s revocation should not detract from the book’s value as an analysis of Christianity. Much of his work deals with religious themes such as faith in God, the institution of the Christian Church, Christian ethics and theology, and the emotions and feelings of individuals when faced with life choices.
An Essay in Experimental Psychologytr. It is not composed of propositions or perceptions of the external world, but of introspection, experiences, and especially one’s relationship with God. The way to Christianity goes through a decision, a crucial decision in the temporal moment; faith is an existential leap.
They would facilitate scholarly use enormously. My favorite of Kierkegaard’s works and the book that has had the most impact philosophically on me. The Christian revelation is not a set of propositions, but a creative act of the individual who has been prepared to fragkents it in part by the very discipline of human idealism, and who through this creative act becomes a new creature.
In this regard Socrates, who lived a life of truth-seeking amid and despite ignorance, is a helpful existential paradigm. University Press Scholarship Online. This does not suffice to solve the riddle of the Revocation.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments – Wikiquote
Above everything else, I think it’s fair that I say that, while I may not be Christian or even a Philosophy major for that matter, Kiekegaard’s writings in this book are intensely enlightening. Paul Gleason rated it it was amazing Mar 31, In the name of Christian faith Kierkegaard rejected not this or that element in Hegelianism but the whole, referring to it in mockery as c the System.
My advice to any prospective reader of Kierkegaard is: The first began during the Great Depression, and was something of a religious stage. As the title suggests, the Postscript is sequel to the earlier Philosophical Fragments.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. To troubleshoot, please check our FAQsunscientifid if you can’t find the answer there, please contact us. Excellent thinkers but really a drudge to get through.
Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a unscientitic chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use for details see www. Once again, Hannay provides enough starting information to allow the reader to begin connecting Kierkegaard’s argumentative dots. Yet it is unlikely to replace the Hong edition in scholarly circles. Is your very existence lived in inwardness with God?
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments – Wikipedia
But no birth is without birth-pangs and no revelation is without an experience of suffering. His early work was written under various pseudonyms who present their own distinctive viewpoints in a complex dialogue. The phrase Everything is relative is spoken emphatically by the very people for whom the atom or its postscipt are still the ultimate reality.